首页    编委会    编辑部    历任主编    获奖信息    征稿简则    友情链接    English    旧版主页
  在线期刊
       最新录用
       当期目次
       过刊浏览

  下载专区
       版权协议
       征稿范文
       来稿登记表
       录用证明

  联系我们

投稿e-mail: jbnuns_sub@bnu.edu.cn

主编e-mail: jbnuns_eic@bnu.edu.cn

办公地点:北京师范大学 科技楼A区216,218,220室

电话:(010)58807851,58802050,58807872

传真:(010)58807851

通信处:北京市海淀区新街口外大街19号北京师范大学理科学报编辑部

邮政编码:100875

行政e-mail: jbnuns@bnu.edu.cn

本网站暂不提供全文下载,如需全文下载请点击

中国知网

 

标题

事业单位考试简版测验组成方法的比较研究

作者

姜亚丽 车宏生 陈海平 陈冠宇 方昱沣

机构

北京师范大学心理学院,心理测量与人力资源研究所

摘要

分别基于因素分析法和逐步回归法,按照因子载荷和对误差解释率的大小,依次组成依次组成包含3、4、5、6个题型的简版测验.计算每种简版测验与全版测验的相关大小,以及在给定误差的情况下,每种简版测验的覆盖率.分别比较在给定及格分数线60和70分时,每种简版测验的总命中率和正命中率.结果为:1)基于因素分析方法开发的四种简版测验与全版测验的相关均达到显著水平,但重复测量的方差分析表明,这些简版测验与完整版测验分数的差异达到显著水平;2)基于逐步回归方法开发的4种简版测验与全版测验的相关均达到显著水平,但重复测量的方差分析表明,包含3和4个分测验的简版测验分数与全版测验的分数差异并不显著;3)当将60分作为及格线时,基于回归分析方法开发的简版测验的总命中率高于相应的基于因素分析方法开发的简版测验的总命中率,但正命中率却低于相应的简版测验.当将70分作为及格线时,基于回归分析方法开发的简版测验的总命中率高于相应的基于因素分析方法开发的简版测验的总命中率,但正命中率却没有表现出类似趋势.总体上讲,基于回归分析方法开发的简版测验其与全版的相关,覆盖率以及命中率优于基于因素分析方法.

关键词

事业单位考试;因素分析法;逐步回归法;简版测验

引用

姜亚丽,车宏生,陈海平,陈冠宇,方昱沣. 事业单位考试简版测验组成方法的比较研究[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,04:429-432.

基金

国家教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(10YJA40003)

分类号

B849

DOI

10.16360/j.cnki.jbnuns.2015.04.018

Title

An exploratory study on the optimal composition method of the General Abilities Test for new staffs

Author

Jiang Yali, Che Hongsheng, Chen Haiping, Chen Guanyu, Fang Yufeng

Affiliations

The Institute of Psychological Measurement and Human Resources, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University

Abstract

Exploratory-factor analysis revealed that only one factor was found by principle component analysis. Four short forms of tests were created, the number of subtests increased by 3, 4, 5, 6 corresponding to factor loading of subtests. The same procedure was conducted using stepwise regression. It was found that correlation between four short forms based on factor analysis, and the full form was significant. It was also found that difference between all four short forms, and the full form was significant. Correlation between the four short forms based on stepwise regression, and the full form was significant. It was found that difference between the short forms which contained three and four subtests, and the full form was not significant. When 60 was used as the pass line, total hit ratio of short forms based on factor analysis was comparatively higher than those based on stepwise regression. However, positive hit ratio was comparatively lower than those based on stepwise regression. When 70 was used as the pass line, total hit ratio of short forms based on factor analysis was comparatively higher than those based on stepwise regression. It can be concluded that features of short form including correlation with full form, coverage and hit ratio based on stepwise regression are better than that based on factor analysis.

Key words

test of personnel recruitment; factor analysis; stepwise regression; short form

cite

Jiang Yali, Che Hongsheng, Chen Haiping, Chen Guanyu, Fang Yufeng. An exploratory study on the optimal composition method of the General Abilities Test for new staffs[J].Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science),2015,04:429-432.

DOI

10.16360/j.cnki.jbnuns.2015.04.018

Copyright © 2014 Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science)
Designed by Mr. Sun Chumin. Email: cmsun@mail.bnu.edu.cn